Skip to main content
Product image not found

HYDROLOGIC, GREAT DISMAL SWAMP VIRGINIA

$16.00
Available

Product Details

Product Number
527692
Series
SIR-2018-5056
Scale
NO SCALE
Alternate ID
SIR-2018-5056
ISBN
978-1-4113-4248-4
Authors
FREDERIC C WURSTER
Version Date
01/01/2018
Countries
USA
Media
Paper
Format
Bound

Additional Details

Description
First posted August 16, 2018

For additional information, contact:

Director, Virgina Water Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 1730 East Parham Road Richmond, VA 23228

Abstract

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, has investigated the hydrology of the Great Dismal Swamp (Swamp) National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) in Virginia and North Carolina and developed a three-dimensional numerical model to simulate groundwater and surface-water hydrology. The model was developed with MODFLOW-NWT, a USGS numerical groundwater flow modeling program, in combination with the Surface-Water Routing Process, a software package that simulates dynamic surface-water flows, water control structure management, and groundwater/surface-water interactions.

The steady-state model was calibrated to average spring conditions by using automated parameter estimation software (PEST) to reduce simulation errors and assess model parameter sensitivity. The model was then used to simulate wet and dry climatic conditions and a variety of hypothetical scenarios in which water levels in the Swamp were raised and lowered by simulated management of water control structures. Results of the model simulations indicate that, under average spring conditions, precipitation is the primary water input (92%); surface-water (5%) and groundwater (3%) inflows make up the remainder. The primary outflow (or loss) is evapotranspiration (55%), with surface outflows (about 41%) and groundwater outflow (about 4%) making up the remainder.

Simulated adjustment of water control structure weir levels demonstrates that groundwater levels are affected by water levels in adjacent ditches and that surface-water and groundwater levels can be controlled through management of water control structures, allowing the Refuge to better manage fire risks and preserve forested-wetland ecosystems in the Refuge. The 13 water control structures proposed in the simulated scenario representing possible future conditions effectively raised simulated water levels in the northeastern corner of the study area, a goal of the Refuge management.

Results of this study demonstrate use of MODFLOW with the Surface-Water Routing Process for simulating water management options in peat wetlands and will help Refuge managers to better understand existing hydrologic conditions, assess the hydrologic effects of planned changes to water control structures, and apply the new simulation tool to guide water management on the Refuge.

Print Date
2018
Height In Inches
11.000
Width In Inches
0.150
Length In Inches
8.500
Two Sided
Yes
Pieces
1
Languages
English
Related Items
POTOMAC AQUIFER VIRGINIA & MD & NC, VA
<p> Prepared in cooperation with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality <p> <p> Sediment Distribution and Hydrologic Conditions of the Potomac Aquifer in Virginia and Parts of Maryland and North Carolina <p>
GREAT DISMAL SWAMP, VA IMPLICATIONS FOR
Hydrology and Water Quality of the Great Dismal Swamp, Virginia and North Carolina, and Implications for Hydrologic-Management Goals and Strategies <p> <p> Scientific Investigations Report 2020-5100 <p> <p> Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <p> By: Gary K. Speiran and Frederic C. Wurster <p> <p> https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205100 <p> <p> First posted October 21, 2021 <p> <p> For additional information, contact: <p> Center Director, <p> dc_va@usgs.gov <p> Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center <p> https://www.usgs.gov/centers/va-wv-water <p> U.S. Geological Survey <p> 1730 East Parham Road <p> Richmond, VA 23228 <p> <p> Abstract <p> <p> The Great Dismal Swamp is a peat wetland in the Coastal Plain of southeastern Virginia and northeastern North Carolina. Timber harvesting and the construction of ditches to drain the swamp and facilitate the harvesting are collectively implicated in changes that altered the wetland forests, caused subsidence and decomposition of the peat, and increased the risk of fire. In response to these changes, managers have implemented strategies to control water levels and rewet the swamp using a network of 64 adjustable-height, water-control structures on the ditches. Rewetting the swamp is intended to re-establish the original wetland-forest types, reduce the risk of fire, reduce subsidence and decomposition of the peat, enhance peat accretion, and reduce the risk of fire. Knowledge of responses of the swamp to hydrologic controls, however, is critical to developing and implementing effective management goals and strategies. Because the 2008 South One fire reemphasized the need for this knowledge, the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service began studies in 2009 to identify critical hydrologic controls and responses to these controls. <p> <p> These studies identified water sources, topography, the two-layered hydraulic characteristics of the peat, the absence of peat in some areas, the ditch and road network, water-control structures on the ditches, the Dismal Swamp Canal and associated infrastructure, and wetland forests as the primary hydrologic controls. Precipitation is the only water source across much of the swamp. The eastward flow of streams and groundwater from the Isle of Wight Plain, across the Suffolk scarp, and into the swamp are additional water sources to the western part of the swamp. Vertical differences in the hydraulic characteristics of the peat reflect an upper peat having a high hydraulic conductivity and specific yield overlying a lower peat and sand having lower hydraulic conductivity and specific yield. The upper peat forms the main aquifer for the storage, flow, and release of water from the swamp. Maintaining water in the upper peat is critical to water availability to the wetland forests because of these properties. <p> <p> Groundwater flows from the swamp into the ditches and the Dismal Swamp Canal where it discharges into nearby streams. Discharge typically is to the closest ditch except where a spoil-pile road that impedes flow intervenes between the swamp and the ditch. When groundwater levels in a ditch are about 2 feet lower than levels in the other three ditches surrounding a part of the swamp, however, most groundwater typically discharges to the ditch having the lower level. This occurs even if a spoil-pile road intervenes between the swamp and the ditch having the lower level. Flow to a single ditch shifts watershed boundaries and groundwater divides toward the ditches having higher water levels and demonstrates how flow and discharge are controlled by ditch water levels. Consequently, managing water levels based on these and other hydrologic controls and responses is critical to achieving management objectives. <p> <p> The chemistry of water across the swamp shows the effects of the peat. Dissolved organic carbon concentrations in the groundwater are among the highest reported globally, ranging from 55 to 195 milligrams per liter. The pH of groundwater and ditch water is commonly less than 4.0 standard units because of organic acids. A relation between the pH and specific conductance of groundwater and ditch water reflects water sources, flow paths, and the chemical evolution, as waters from the different sources mix and flow along the paths. <p>
PEAK FLOW CHARACTERISTIC VIRGINIA STREAM
Prepared in cooperation with the Virginia Department of Transportation <p> Peak-Flow Characteristics of Virginia Streams